Sunday, April 30, 2006

Five Most Favorite On-Line Visual Instant Gratification

Caution: for those who just love the beauty in visual form, i must warn you that these sites/blogs are ticking timebomb. You can lost hours,days,weeks viewing them. Seriously.

1. www.sbritt.com
2. www.jo-brown.co.uk
3. www.loobylu.com
4. wardomatic.blogspot.com
5. the ultimate www.flickr.com

addictive as they are, i think they should be banned during this july and august '06 ("peak season" for those who wants to graduate on september..hehe)

Five Most Favorite Citizens of Bikini Bottom

  1. Squidward – the resident voluntary-social-outcast

I’m not just trying to be unorthodox here, by not putting the title character on notch #1. But Squidward is truly the most genuine/untypical character is a cartoon show (or any show for that matter). He’s not mean; he’s just cranky for he constantly wishes that he’s somewhere else. Instead of stuck at a dead-end job at a junk-food restaurant with an evil capitalist boss and an over-excited workmate, that is. He enjoys the finer things is life, like playing clarinet for hours, free-interpretation dance class, and canned-bread. He’s such a cultural dork.

  1. Patrick Star – the resident johny knoxville

Patrick is what you get when you cross a ‘slacker’ with a ‘jackass’, so he surely knows how to have fun. He is constantly unemployed and wears nothing else than a floral boxer shorts (and I don’t think he has a closet full of those boxers and changes them daily, so I think he never change his boxers..speaking of personal hygiene, people!). He spends his days by doing, well, nothing. He really cares about Spongebob and always wants to help out his best mate, but due to his intelligence (or lack thereof) he usually ends up screwing things up. Well at least it’s the thought that counts.

  1. Spongebob Squarepants – the resident sweetheart slash loser

I still can’t get over the fact that Spongebob is actually a scouring pad, the kind that you would use when you’re doing your dishes. But instead of the sink with plates, pans and pots, his habitat is at the bottom of the ocean with fishes, crabs, and sea-stars. I mean, how did the creators of this show come up with this idea? But come to think of it: sponge DOES belong in the sea, since it’s actually dried mollusk. Anyway, biological facts aside, Spongebob is a brilliant character. He’s naïve in the sweetest way and somewhat believes there’re goodness in every single person. That’s why people love him. Not to forget those big round eyes, tin-whistle nose, and gapped front teeth. OH, and even though I hate pineapple, I SO love his pineapple house.

  1. Flying Dutchman – the resident ghoul

He used to be a pirate, but when he died instead of giving him a proper burial that a pirate deserves, people put his corpse on a show (kinda like Madame Tussaud’s wax statue, but more creepy). So know he seeks revenge by haunting the living. It was actually quite a grave history. But yet Flying Dutchman is anything but frightening. He would pop out of nowhere and say the stupidest things, which are supposed to be scary. Poor guy.

  1. That generic brown fish John Doe – the resident nobody

He’s this nameless, insignificant character that would only say a line and then never shows up on any scene for the rest of the episode. He usually plays the role of a customer at Krusty Krab, or a passer-by at the streets of Bikini Bottom. His lines only varies between something like “one Krabby Patty, please” to “Look, it’s the bird man!”. He always wears brown trousers with a buckled belt. You know you’re a Spongebob-addict if you know what I’m talking about J

Actually I love all the characters in this ingenious show, so it’s definitely not a slim-picking. I had some tough time deciding about who would make the list. But finally I settled down with those five as my favorite of all time. What are yours?

Five Reasons why Boxer is the best Dog in the ‘hood

Boxer has been my family’s pet dog for more than 10 yrs now. Make no mistake people, he’s NOT a Boxer-breed. He’s just a ‘village’ dog J We gave him the name ‘Boxer’ for some stupid reason too tedious to mention here. He can do those dog tricks like ‘sit’, ‘roll over’, ‘play dead’, ‘stand on hind legs’ or ‘be quiet’, but not on command.

He ain’t no Lassie, but he is not a bad family dog...

  1. He’s cheap

Literally and metaphorically speaking. My dad bought him in a Chinese food restaurant (don’t ask) for only Rp 10.000, about 10 years ago. Do you know what Golden Ret or a Schitzu will cost you? Well, certainly more than Rp 10.000. And Boxer acts like the cheap dog he is. He eats anything that is..(ummm I was about to say ‘edible’ there, but I guess ‘karet gelang’ would fall in to that category, would it?). Well, he eats anything, period. No need for those nutritious-omega-three-gingko-biloba canned dog food!

  1. He’s phat

No, actually I mean Fat. Plump. Corpulent. Chubby. Stout. Heavy. Obese. Large. And he’s not tall either. He’s kinda like a big salami with legs and head. Which is a good good thing because if he’s tall and skinny then he would look like that generic ‘kampung’ dog. That’s why I used to secretly feed him with left over Christmas cookies (his fave is cheese castengels). At least people were misguided when they first saw him, thinking that he’s a foreign-breed dog (and there’s also this one time when someone mistaken him as a pig).

  1. He barks quite convincingly

Well at least if you don’t see him. He really doesn’t look like a guard dog, seriously. I once saw on TV, this show about guard dogs. There’s this guy whose dogs has won numerous best-in-show awards telling the viewer the physical feature of a good guard dog. Straight and sturdy legs. When the dogs stands on its 4 feet, seen from the side its back is supposed to be a straight line. Pointy-instead-of-floppy ears. Negate all those features and you can pretty much describe Boxer. At least the bark makes up for the physical flaws.

  1. He buries his treasure for future emergencies, just in case. SMART!

Which is not exactly a good idea, since ‘treasure’ here refers to loaves of bread that my sis tossed at him when she ‘has no time’ to feed him the proper meal. He doesn’t actually like bread but maybe he think he may want to eat them one day, so he normally buries them. Usually the day after, we would find him chewing his jaws off, struggling to eat a dirt-covered loaf of bread. We don’t know whether to feel pity or mad at him.

  1. He has never bitten me, ever.

While it’s only mandatory for other (more intelligent) dogs not to bite their master, I’m actually proud of the fact that Box has never intentionally bitten me. This is because there’s actually a not-so-short list of his victims. I know that I should worry about the aggressive behavior, but I’m still happy for not being on that list. Well, who says that happiness isn’t relative?

Five Most Favorite (painting) Artist

  1. Norman Rockwell

Rockwell’s art is very very American, in a very very good way. He did the ‘Four Freedom’ series of illustration for the US government’s campaign. Most of his works are posters, magazine covers and illustration, but he also did oil on canvas (and he did it superbly, I might add). One of his most well-known paintings is probably the “Triple Self Potrait”, but my favorite is “Gossip” (cunning story-telling skill!). Probably due to his background as a magazine illustrator, Rockwell usually emphasized on facial expression and the mental-atmosphere of a situation instead of the shape and composition of objects constituting that situation. His line is clean, with easy-on-the-eyes colors and thoughtful details. Rockwell often used people with jovial expression, interacting with each other with a touch a situational comedy as his object. He seldom painted a single person, and when he did usually the object is somewhat ‘interacting’ with something else, such as a reflection on a mirror (“Mirror”, “Triple Self Potrait”), or a painting (“Critic”), or a burnt cigarette (“Fire”). You won’t have to frown or think hard to figure out what his paintings mean which is a good thing for me; but some people his art as “too commercial” (so what’s wrong with being commercial?). All you need is an eye for the details. Some sense of humor would also help… and let Rockwell makes you smile.

  1. Andrew Wyeth

If Rockwell’s works convey humor and happiness, Wyeth’s convey calmness and some therapeutical value. Wyeth’s equivalence in music would probably be the Kings of Convenience. Looking at his works (even though only via computer monitor) usually takes me into a quiet, not-so-sunny summer afternoon…the smell of grass and summer blossom is filling the air…summer breeze is wiping my face and fluttering my hair..there’s a sense of tranquility and a feeling that nothing could go wrong (breath in, breath out….sigh!). Wyeth is a (post) impressionist and he really knows how to put the ray of light on to the canvas (isn’t that what being an impressionist all about?). And it just didn’t seem like he’s trying. All of his works are done with breath-taking scrutiny (best example is “Wind from the Sea”, and also the “Helga” series), but at the same thing it has this laid-back, effortless feel to it. My all time fave of Wyeth’s is definitely “Christina’s World”. I saw it first on the Encyclopedia Americana (yes, I read encyclopedias) and i remember thinking ‘oh it’s a nice painting..ho-hum’. But then I read about the story behind the painting, and then I look at the painting again (printed in black and white, with the size of ID card)..and there’s this poignant feeling inside, bittersweet ripples that turned into waves of sadness (but not the weepy kind of sad). It was the 1st and only time for me, that painting actually made me almost-cry. And for that reason, and so many unexplainable reasons, Andrew is my fave of all time.

  1. Edward Hopper

Hopper’s works kinda resembles Wyeth’s, in terms of the feeling they conveys. But Hopper’s peace and calm feel has more of a dark/lonely note to it. Only slightly, though. I guess that most people would agree that loneliness is a sad thing, but Hopper depicted it in a way that makes loneliness seems so beautiful. His most well-known (and most powerful, in my opinion) work is “Nighthawk”. The stranded streets, the guy sitting on the left-hand side of the counter (we can only see his back), the intensity of light inside the diner (a bit sterile-hospital-neon-ish)..all of the details just scream out the word ‘lonely!’ in a very subtle kind of way. Other less-subtle examples are “Morning Sun”, “Hotel-Room”, “Automat”, and “NY movie” (a personal favorite). Each of them depicted a woman standing/sitting alone lost in her thought (why is it always a woman?). Another “signature” he often used in his pieces is bright color (“Chop Suey” is a perfect example). I think it’s contradictive and at the same brilliant that he used bright,vibrant color in paintings with such a “dark” theme.

  1. Vincent van Gogh

He’s one of the most well-known art giant of all times. Kinda overwhelm me a bit to write about his work. He’s most famous for the sunflower series that he painted during his years in Arles, France. Another one of his masterpieces is the Starry Night. Actually the painting doesn’t exactly look like a starry night sky; it’s even more beautiful than the real thing! oh I’m so out of words. I mean, it’s Van Gogh..what more can I say?

  1. Auguste Renoir

Another giant. Already out of words to describe him. He’s famous for his excellence in painting how light would reflect on a person’s face. There’s also one of his painting where people were sitting under a tree, and there were light coming through openings between leaves. He painted the reflection of light in every single face and it looks flawlessly natural. I once read in Reader’s Digest that some interviewer asked Renoir how he knew when his brushstroke was “right” when he was painting the reflection of light on a face. His answer was “when it feels like pinching”.

I despise art critics because they usually only talk about the technical/originality aspects of ‘art’. Why dichotomize such a fluid thing as art into ‘bad’ and ‘good’? Why does there have to be an objectivity (common subjectivity) about art? Isn’t art supposed to be personal and subjective? Isn’t it supposed to mean different things to a different person? Isn’t it more about it makes you feel, instead of how your senses ‘feel’ about it?

Five Things to Keep in Mind while Reading this Blog

  1. The author of this blog is an introvert person disguising as an extrovert (or is it the other way around?? Oh whatever). She’s not exactly sitting-on-coach-eating-chessum-Pringles-watching-friends­­ (i.e. comfortable) writing her heart out but surprisingly she has some fun doing so. To avoid over-scrutinizing/ questioning/judging/nosey-ing, she would state in prior that this blog is NOT a personal diary. All of the similarity in names/characters/events/places is purely coincidental:)
  2. None of the posted articles about films/book/records/tv shows/artists (usually with title beginning with Top 5 most fave..such a cheesy title, she knows) is meant to be a review of some sort. The author despises pretentious critics who think they know what they’re talking about. All of those articles are just further elaboration about her personal favorites.
  3. This is her 1st blog. So all the rookie-mistakes are excused (and she’s definitely not a tech-freak, so that’s like a double excuse)
  4. No pseudo-philosophical, quasi-philosophical, philosophical, or anti-philosophical stuffs here. This is just her crazy talking (and having fun).
  5. Please feel free to leave your comments. Let her know what you think :)